My Space and My Place

    • Home
    • Inquiry 2021
    • Digital Technologies Site
    • VTaL Site
    • VTaL G+


The following is an example of Creating a short, animated presentation in Scratch, and how this way of presenting could be used by students to Share their Learning.

The presentation includes the use of:

  • text (in speech bubbles) to communicate ideas
  • basic animations to give more realistic movements
  • basic animations to capture attention
  • backdrops relevant to the presentation
As you can see, the presentation can be embedded into blog posts, alongside the work that the presentation is describing or referring to.


Game Screencastify 1
Game Screencastify 2
Game Screencastify 3
Game Screencastify 4
Game Screencastify 5

Share
Tweet
Pin
Share
No Comments

Briefly restate the specific change you want to bring about in student learning and the evidence used to select that focus

My target group of learners for my Inquiry 2020 will be my Year 11 NCEA Level 1 class. I intend inquiring into the process of using the LearnCoach online programs (content) and VTaL Visible Teaching and Learning (workflow) to accelerate student achievement for Tamaki College students undertaking courses in Digital Technologies NCEA Levels 1, 2 and 3.


From inquiring into the Student Voice that I collated through discussions, and also through student comments, both forms of feedback indicated 

  • that learners did not necessarily understand the formative feedback that I was providing them with in order to progress forward in their learning; or, 
  • that they didn't understand why I was asking them to share their work, and through the sharing process, reflecting on the task, would give them a greater understanding of the work.

Therefore the specific change that I want to bring about in student learning is 'Student Understanding'.  The way that I intend focussing on Student Understanding, is by inquiring into learning interventions to support the following:

  1. Comprehension - levels of support required for task completion of assessment tasks
  2. Meeting Assessment Criteria - outcome or impact of pace of task completion for Technical Skills Tasks, and levels of support required to complete assessment tasks, and how these combine to maintain engagement in meeting assessment deadlines 

Share
Tweet
Pin
Share
No Comments

Plan and conduct detailed inquiry into specific aspects of your current teaching that are relevant to the hypotheses you identified in the literature.

My target group of learners for my Inquiry 2020 will be my Year 11 NCEA Level 1 class. I intend inquiring into the process of using the LearnCoach online programs (content) and VTaL Visible Teaching and Learning (workflow) to accelerate student achievement for Tamaki College students undertaking courses in Digital Technologies NCEA Levels 1, 2 and 3.



Specific Aspects of my Current Teaching

The following are ways that I have inquired into specific aspects of my current teaching that are relevant to the hypothesis I identified in the literature.  

Hypothesis from Reading 1
    "

Although this particular reading focussed around collaborative strategies for teaching reading comprehension, I can see the benefit of some of these strategies to assist learners with developing a better understanding of assessment tasks and assessment requirements.  This can be achieved with having clear, concise 'Checklists', as outlined in the first section highlighted in yellow "Checklists, rating scales, and rubrics, developed with colleagues and in some cases with students in advance of instruction or early in the lesson, establish the criteria for post lesson assessment".


Hypothesis from Reading 2

Aspects of this particular reading align with strategies that I am implementing with the students in terms of the use of the Year Level Google+ Community.  More specifically, the last section highlighted in pink that reads "Online asynchronous discussions also provide learners with opportunities to prepare, reflect, think, and search for additional information before participating in a discussion".  The strategies are not in exact alignment, in that students are not necessarily searching for additional information before participating in a discussion.  

Hypothesis from Reading 3

I feel happy

The blog comment that one of the learners included in the blog post, BP4,  suggests that the learner feels happy, and proud by the following sentences in his comment "I like sharing my work into the Year 11 DigiTEch Google+ Community because I like to help other students out with what they're confused about." and "I share my work into the Year 11 DigiTEch Google+ Community not only because it makes me feel proud but because it's helping other students as well."

I can think and learn

The blog comment that one of the learners included in the blog post, BP4,  indicates that the work that the learner shares into the Year 11 DigiTech Google+ Community, including the title and description of the work, gives him a greater understanding of the work "It gives me a greater understanding of the work that I have completed and shared because you need to know what is the heading of the work, what's about and where you find it."

I feel part of the school community

The response that students provided to Question 1 and Question 5 in the blog post, BP4, suggests that the students feel a part of the "Class" or "Subject" community, by all responding YES to the use of the Year 11 DigiTech Google community to share their tasks.

 

Whilst the data that was collected, was in the form of a questionnaire conducted via the chat function in a Google Hangout, and didn't follow any of the examples of data collection in the reading, the data still gave an indication of various aspects of student wellbeing by students using the digital tool of a Google+ Community to support their learning.  Although it is just a snapshot of student wellbeing, there is enough positive feedback to see how the use of the Google+ Community supports student learning.

 



Analysis of Workspace Setup for Learners

The way in which I set up the Workspace for Year 11 Assessments, is by having a range of Tools and Techniques related activities that aligns with the LearnCoach videos, at the start of the lesson sequence, then followed by the assessment tasks.  Students have to complete the Tools and Techniques activities, in order to build their skill base to be able to develop the outcome.  After which, they are then able to start the assessment task.  

In order to monitor the progression of skill level, the students have to create a screencastify of each task, and submit this into the Workspace.  This also serves as a rewindable resource for the students to refer back to during the assessment, when they are developing their outcome.   Skill level progress can be monitored in the Class Tracking Sheet.  The inclusion of the Class Tracking Sheet relates back to my hypothesis from Reading 1.  The Class Tracking Sheet linked into the Workspace allows students to use the checklist as follows: "Checklists, rating scales, and rubrics, developed with colleagues and in some cases with students in advance of instruction or early in the lesson, establish the criteria for post lesson assessment".

The following image is a link to a short video of how the Develop a Computer Game Workspace has been set up.




Student Voice

I've undertaken two different forms of Student Voice to inform me of how students are or are not learning, according to the different learning strategies that I have put in place for the Develop a Computer Game Assessment. 

Student Voice from Discussions about responding to Formative Feedback - The feedback that I learnt from the discussions is that students are not responding to the formative feedback that I am providing them with in the form of comments within their Google docs, because (a) they don't understand what the feedback is asking them to do, or (b) they didn't understand what the feedback was asking in relation to the task.

Student Voice from Comments about the use of Google+ Communities (now Currents) - The feedback that I learnt from the Blog Comments ranged in terms of understanding, or not understanding, why they were being asked to "describe the work that they had shared, in addition to including a post title and the link to the work itself", in the Year Level Google+ Community and how that was of benefit to their own learning and progress.
Share
Tweet
Pin
Share
No Comments

I adapted the Internal Assessment Evidence Gathering Template from NZQA into Google doc format, for NCEA DigiTech assessments that I am delivering with my students.

Student Tracking Sheets are resources that I have used with my senior students for quite a few years now.  However, I decided to adapt the templates that NZQA published, in order for the format to stay consistent with what students will become familiar with.

The reason that I adapted the templates into Google doc format, is to enable learners to link their evidence into a Student Checklist, and also so that I can drop comments or feedback into the checklist.  I have entered the Evidence that I expect students to link, in blue text colour, to differentiate from the assessment criteria from the standard information.  

Having the template as a Google doc enables the resource to be user friendly and functional; especially when submitting work for moderation.

AS91884 (PDF, 97KB) - Use basic iterative processes to develop a digital outcome


Internal Assessment

Evidence Gathering Template


Learner Name


NSN


Subject

101DGT - DigiTech Level 1

Level

1

Standard No.

AS91884

Version

1

Standard Title

Use basic iterative processes to develop a digital outcome


Achieved

Merit

Excellence

Use basic iterative processes to develop a digital outcome.

Use basic iterative processes to develop an informed digital outcome.

Use basic iterative processes to develop a refined digital outcome.


Key requirements (list):

A 

M

E

Planning a digital outcome to address a problem, need, opportunity, or interest


Statement of Intent


✔ or ✖



Managing the development by decomposing the digital outcome into smaller components


Statement of Intent


✔ or ✖



Trialling components of the outcome in an iterative manner


Testing Logbook


✔ or ✖



Testing that the digital outcome functions as intended


Testing Logbook


✔ or ✖



Describing relevant implications.


Testing Logbook


✔ or ✖



Using information from testing and trialling to improve the outcome


Improvements Logbook



✔ or ✖


Trialling multiple components and/or techniques and selecting the most suitable


Improvements Logbook



✔ or ✖


Addressing relevant implications


Statement of Intent

Testing Logbook

Improvements Logbook



✔ or ✖


Applying information from the planning, testing and trialling of components to develop a high-quality outcome.


Statement of Intent

Testing Logbook

Improvements Logbook




✔ or ✖


Sufficiency statement:

Achieved

All of A must be ticked

Merit

All of A and M must be ticked

Excellence

All of A and M and E must be ticked

TICK OVERALL GRADE

N

A

M

E






Share
Tweet
Pin
Share
No Comments

Explain how some of the data you have used to build a profile of the students’ learning will be used as baseline data at the end of the year.

My target group of learners for my Inquiry 2020 will be my Year 11 NCEA Level 1 class. I intend inquiring into the process of using the LearnCoach online programs (content) and VTaL Visible Teaching and Learning (workflow) to accelerate student achievement for Tamaki College students undertaking courses in Digital Technologies NCEA Levels 1, 2 and 3.



When I looked at the Tracking Sheet on 22 June (shown below), there were still a handful of learners who were not showing any shifts in terms of work output and task completion.  This was after setting strict deadlines in place for the individual tasks, providing specific feedback and feedforward to the learners of what they needed to do to progress forward with their work, and also emailing the students respond to the feedback that I had provided them with, and give an explanation as to why they haven't finished the work.  It was time to have a chat.



I met with the learners individually.  When I asked them why they haven't responded to my feedback, or why they haven't updated their work, these were the following responses:

Student 1 - "I don't understand the feedback.  I don't understand what you're asking me to do.  I prefer talking to you one to one instead of ".

From my observations in class time, I knew that this learner was very capable at undertaking the coding tasks.  I often needed to prompt them to stay on track, but I knew that they could cope with the coding tasks.  So I was quite perplexed as to why they were not updating their work based on the feedback that I was providing them with.

Student 2 - "I don't know why Miss." [In response to me inquiring into the way that they prefer to learn]  "I don't mind, I'll do whatever you ask me to".

As the conversation continued, I realised how difficult it was for this student to freely express how they felt, and also, they didn't like to ask for any sort of feedback or help.  We talked about their favourite subject, why it was their favourite subject, and what we could do that might be similar and enable them to complete work.

Student 3 - "I know what to do Miss".

This student is playing catchup due to ongoing absence from class.  I know this student to be an able student, who is able to complete tasks when they are at school and focussed on the work.



Following the discussions that I had with the three learners, I sat with Student 1 during class time, which they were happy for.  I noticed that when we were working together on a section of the task, that the student would stop when they were not able to spell a word or if they were unsure of the grammar.  They would literally stop working.  They wouldn't try to spell the word, nor would they try to find out how the word was spelt, as a coping strategy and means of continuing to work.  They would just stop working.  I sat and explained numerous times, that they were not being assessed on their ability to spell, or their grammar.  I only wanted them to demonstrate that they understood that section of work.  I prompted the learner to keep writing, even though they misspelt the words.  This took a bit of convincing.  Once I managed to get them to continue writing, they finished the sentence, and could see the spell check options that popped up to correct the words.  This made them happy, and also enabled them to overcome the hurdle of spelling and grammar.  However, this only occurred when I sat with the learner.  Almost as though my presence, prompting and ongoing positive feedback is what enabled the learner to continue with the work.



My next steps are to use the information obtained from the discussions with learners and strategies applied in class, to enable learners to progress with learning tasks without the need for me to sit with them the whole time; essentially, developing strategies for the learners to become more empowered and self sufficient in their learning and not dependent on me to do work.  In addition, the strategies need to be developed that still enables learners to know that they are able to ask for help and feedback, but that they don't need to wait for me to prompt them, in order to attempt learning activities.

I may look at developing a matrix in conjunction with the learners, to prompt student learning.  I will put together a draft of this over the holiday break, and the discussion with learners when I see them again at the beginning of Term 3.




Share
Tweet
Pin
Share
No Comments
Newer Posts
Older Posts

About Me

Kia ora! I am the Head of Technology at Tāmaki College and also teach Digital Technologies.


My target group of learners for my Inquiry 2021 will be my Year 12 NCEA Level 2 class. This group of learners were my target group from my 2020 Inquiry. I would like to inquire into whether Academic Writing exemplars specific to Digital Technologies, in conjunction with the 'Explanation Writing' classroom display resources for Digital Technologies, based on SOLO taxonomy, could accelerate achievement in literacy in my subject.


My target group of learners for my Inquiry 2020 were my Year 11 NCEA Level 1 class. I inquired into the process of using the LearnCoach online programs (content) and VTaL Visible Teaching and Learning (workflow) to accelerate student achievement for Tamaki College students undertaking courses in Digital Technologies NCEA Levels 1, 2 and 3.


In 2019, my inquiry is to maximise pedagogical practices (relating to integrated education, and collaborative teaching and learning), to effectively shift student achievement, supported by digital platforms connected to visible teaching and learning.


My Inquiry in 2018, was to develop a VTaL Purpose-Built Innovative Tool, to enable all elements of the VTaL Framework to be accessible to teachers, in order to accelerate student achievement.


In 2017, my inquiry was based on raising student achievement and shifting teacher practice around effective pedagogical practices including Learn, Create and Share. This will be achieved through the development, implementation and monitoring of the Visible Teaching and Learning Framework.

recent posts

Blog Archive

  • ►  2022 (8)
    • ►  March (3)
    • ►  February (5)
  • ►  2021 (16)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (2)
    • ►  June (4)
    • ►  May (3)
    • ►  March (2)
    • ►  February (1)
  • ▼  2020 (42)
    • ►  November (2)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  August (7)
    • ▼  July (5)
      • Create an Animation in Scratch to Share your Learning
      • BP 8 : The specific change I want to bring about i...
      • BP 7 : Aspects of my current teaching | Workspace ...
      • Internal Assessment | Evidence Gathering Template ...
      • BP6 : Building a profile of students' learning fro...
    • ►  June (4)
    • ►  May (7)
    • ►  April (7)
    • ►  March (3)
    • ►  February (4)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2019 (30)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  August (3)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (12)
    • ►  February (9)
  • ►  2018 (41)
    • ►  November (7)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  August (4)
    • ►  July (4)
    • ►  May (7)
    • ►  April (4)
    • ►  March (5)
    • ►  February (7)
  • ►  2017 (65)
    • ►  December (2)
    • ►  November (22)
    • ►  October (6)
    • ►  September (6)
    • ►  August (10)
    • ►  June (4)
    • ►  May (3)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (4)
    • ►  February (6)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2016 (26)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  November (18)
    • ►  September (6)
    • ►  August (1)

VTaL

  • VTaL (104)
  • VTaL 01 Subject Sites (33)
  • VTaL 02 Learning Activities (7)
  • VTaL 03 Tracking Sheets (28)
  • VTaL 04 Student Checklists (12)
  • VTaL 05 Calendars with Links (24)
  • VTaL 06 Workspaces (32)
  • VTaL 07 Student Sites (4)
  • VTaL 08 Year Level Sites (3)
  • VTaL 09 Subject Communities (26)
  • VTaL 10 Student Blogs (11)
  • VTaL and Google Hangouts (15)
  • VTaL and Student Achievement (45)
  • VTaL for Parents (13)
  • VTaL for Students (82)
  • VTaL for Teachers (32)

Presentations

  • GAFE (19)
  • My YouTube Videos (8)
  • Presentations (21)

Inquiry

  • Inquiry (134)
  • Inquiry 2019 (27)
  • Inquiry 2020 (34)
  • Inquiry 2021 (15)

Manaiakalani

  • CoL (167)
  • Inquiry (134)
  • Inquiry 2020 (34)
  • Learn Create Share (11)
  • MIT 2018 (16)
  • Manaiakalani (18)
  • Presentations (21)
  • SPARK MIT (59)

Tamaki College

  • 2018 Department Goals (2)
  • 2018 School Goals (3)
  • 2019 Department Goals (2)
  • CoL (167)
  • Collaborative Learning Environments (32)
  • Covid19 (29)
  • Cultural Responsiveness (10)
  • Differentiation (12)
  • EMR Collaborative Project (21)
  • Goals (2)
  • Human Rights Collaborative Project (5)
  • Integrated Education (24)
  • Kia Eke Panuku (8)
  • LearnCoach (2)
  • Literacy (21)
  • PLD (18)
  • Techies (12)
  • Technological Modelling (4)

Practicing Teacher Criteria

  • PTC01 (31)
  • PTC02 (9)
  • PTC03 (6)
  • PTC04 (61)
  • PTC05 (17)
  • PTC06 (42)
  • PTC07 (32)
  • PTC08 (34)
  • PTC09 (8)
  • PTC10 (7)
  • PTC11 (16)
  • PTC12 (54)

General

  • CoL (167)
  • Collaborative Learning Environments (32)
  • Cultural Responsiveness (10)
  • Differentiation (12)
  • Feedback - Parent Voice (2)
  • Feedback - Staff Voice (6)
  • Feedback - Student Voice (23)
  • GAFE (19)
  • Goals (2)
  • Integrated Education (24)
  • Kia Eke Panuku (8)
  • LearnCoach (2)
  • Literacy (21)
  • My YouTube Videos (8)
  • Review (14)
  • Student Agency (15)

Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Total Pageviews

Created with by BeautyTemplates| Distributed By Gooyaabi Templates