My Space and My Place

    • Home
    • Inquiry 2021
    • Digital Technologies Site
    • VTaL Site
    • VTaL G+
The following is a breakdown of strategies that I've applied during Term 1 to enable Level 2 DigiTech students to achieve NCEA Level 2 as their minimum qualification.

School Goal 3 Transition

That 95% of the Year 13 cohort achieve NCEA Level 2 as their minimum qualification.

DigiTech NCEA Level 2

By navigating to the NCEA Level 2 > Overview and Calendar section in my DigiTech with Ms Anderson website, the first project that the Level 2 students could work on is either 'Create a Webpage', 'Create a Program', or 'Use DCTs'.
I entered all of the students into the 'Create a Webpage Unit Standard 25655 worth 3 Level 2 credits, to build on their website development knowledge from NCEA Level 1.
The following is the credit breakdown for DigiTech NCEA Level 2 at the end of Term 1. The sections that follow the breakdown, are the updates throughout the term, as well as the strategies and interventions that were applied to enable students to achieve.

Term 1 Week 3 Update - NCEA Level 2 Create a Website 25655

Term 1 Week 3 Update - Strategies and Interventions

The Strategies and Interventions that I applied after the Week 3 Update includes:
  • Student 1
    • 22 Feb - Meeting with student. Determined that the student was working on stakeholders in Task 2
  • Student 2
    • 22 Feb - Meeting with student. Workspace has been working since yesterday. Currently working on Task 2 Resources. Wants to create a website about Rugby League.
  • Student 3
    • 22 Feb - Meeting with student. Working on stakeholders in Task 2. Wants his website to be about Rugby League.
  • Student 4
    • 22 Feb - Meeting with student. Submitted Task 2 for marking. Unsure about Task 1 in terms of readiness for submission. Will check Task 1 and start Task 3.
  • Student 5
    • 22 Feb - Meeting with student. Working on stakeholders in Task 2.
  • Student 6
    • 22 Feb - Meeting with student. Needs to finish Task 1 Testing Procedures. Currently also working on Context Brainstorm.
These above mentioned meetings are not the only interactions with the students, so don't include informal Q & A throughout the lessons. These are formal meetings in an informal setting with each student, to establish points of reference; where in the project is the student currently working, and what needs to happen to progress forward.

Term 1 Week 4 Update - NCEA Level 2 Create a Website 25655

Term 1 Week 4 Update - Strategies and Interventions

At this stage, students were falling well behind the due dates for individual tasks to be completed.
The Strategies and Interventions that I applied after the Week 4 Update includes:
    • Student 1
      • 6 March - Peer Support from Dell to meet deadlines [Tuakana-Teina Collaborative Teaching Strategy].
      • 9 March - Meeting with Level 2 students. Project Update; explain Monday catchup session.
    • Student 2
      • 6 March - Student Absent Q.
      • 9 March - Student Absent Q.
    • Student 3
      • 6 March - Peer Support from Sione to meet deadlines [Tuakana-Teina Collaborative Teaching Strategy].
    • Student 4
      • 6 March - Peer Support from Gus to meet deadlines [Tuakana-Teina Collaborative Teaching Strategy].
    • Student 5
      • 6 March - Peer Support from Tau to meet deadlines [Tuakana-Teina Collaborative Teaching Strategy].
    • Student 6
      • 6 March - Peer Support from Issam to meet deadlines [Tuakana-Teina Collaborative Teaching Strategy].

    Term 1 Week 5 Update - NCEA Level 2 Create a Website 25655

    Term 1 Week 6 Update - NCEA Level 2 Create a Website 25655

    Term 1 Week 6 Update - Strategies and Interventions

    At this stage, students were falling well behind the due dates for individual tasks to be completed.
    The Strategies and Interventions that I applied after the Week 5 Update includes:
      • Student 1
        • 20 March - I rung home and left a message on parent's mobile, explaining that Student 1 is at risk of not completing their assessment that is due on Thursday 22nd March. Student 1 did not attend the lunch time session today, nor did they attend the after school session last Monday. I am available tomorrow at interval and lunchtime for student to complete their work.
        • 21 March - Meeting with Parent and Student about the current assessment, and what needs to happen to achieve.
      • Student 2
        • 20 March - Student Absent Q.
        • 21 March - Student Absent Q.
      • Student 3
        • 20 March - I rung home , explaining that Student 3 is at risk of not completing their assessment that is due on Thursday 22nd March. Student 3 did not attend the lunch time session today, nor did they attend the after school session last Monday. I am available tomorrow at interval and lunchtime for student to complete his work.
      • Student 4
        • 20 March - Student Absent. 
      • Student 5
        • 20 March - Student Absent Q.
        • 21 March - Student Absent Q.
      • Student 6
        • 20 March - Student Absent Q. 
        • 21 March - Student Absent Q.

      Term 1 Week 7 Update - NCEA Level 2 Create a Website 25655


      Term 1 Week 10 Update - NCEA Level 2 Create a Website 25655


      Term 1 Update - NCEA Level 2 Create a Website 25655

      Term 1 Update - Strategies and Interventions

      The Strategies and Interventions that I applied by the end of Term 1 includes:
      • Student 1
        • 5 April - Project Update Survey whereby students submitted feedback on tasks that they had completed, strategies that they could and should apply to complete work, and feedback on specific help required from the teacher.
        • 9 April - Student is awaiting moderation feedback on Project 1.
      • Student 2
        • 5 April - Student Absent.
        • 6 April - Student Absent.
      • Student 3
        • 5 April - Project Update Survey whereby students submitted feedback on tasks that they had completed, strategies that they could and should apply to complete work, and feedback on specific help required from the teacher.
        • 9 April - Student is awaiting moderation feedback on Project 1.
      • Student 4
        • 5 April - Project Update Survey whereby students submitted feedback on tasks that they had completed, strategies that they could and should apply to complete work, and feedback on specific help required from the teacher.
        • 9 April - Student is awaiting moderation feedback on Project 1.
      • Student 5
        • 5 April - Project Update Survey whereby students submitted feedback on tasks that they had completed, strategies that they could and should apply to complete work, and feedback on specific help required from the teacher. Extension negotiated due to an Off-Site 3-day Course in the previous week.
        • 6 April - Lunch time catchup - did not attend.
        • 9 April - Reassessment opportunity to be completed in Student's own time - due 29 April.
      • Student 6
        • 5 April - Project Update Survey whereby students submitted feedback on tasks that they had completed, strategies that they could and should apply to complete work, and feedback on specific help required from the teacher. Extension negotiated due to an Off-Site 3-day Course in the previous week.
        • 6 April - Lunch time catchup - did not attend.
        • 9 April - Submitted Project 1 work for moderation.

      Overview of Term 1 Tracking and Teaching Interventions for School Goal 3

      In addition to the various VTaL tools (Tool 01 - Google Sites, Tool 02 - SOLO Learning Activities, Tool 03 - Class Project Class Lists, Tool 06 - Workspaces and Tool 09 - Subject Google+), that were applied to the delivery of the Create a Website NCEA Level 3 Project, the range of teaching strategies and interventions also included:
      1. Formal Meetings with Students
      2. Tuakana-Teina Collaborative Teaching Strategy
      3. Student Reflection through the use of Project Update Surveys using Google Forms
      4. Interval, Lunch time and After School Catch Up Sessions
      5. Contact with Home
      6. Parent Meeting
      The Class Task Lists - Tracking Sheets, enabled regular feedback to be submitted back to students to identify where they were within the project. This also helped to inform my practice in terms of the strategies and interventions that were required to enable the students to achieve.

      The key motivators for students to achieve could be separated into two different categories; intrinsic motivation whereby the student was motivated enough to apply the tools and teaching strategies to achieve, as well as extrinsic motivation whereby students responded to outside influences such as parent contact, to motivate them to complete tasks. In addition to this, students were who involved in Off-Site courses struggled to keep up with in-class course work and keep to the deadlines. This is not always the case, but it was the case for this particular project.

      Teaching is exhausting! However, with appropriate tools in place, eg. the use of VTaL, ongoing pedagogical practices can be identified, applied, and adapted, to enable student achievement to be tracked and monitored during the assessment, as opposed to discovering at the conclusion of the assessment that students were not able to meet the criteria.


      Share
      Tweet
      Pin
      Share
      No Comments

      Department Goal 1 for 2018 is that 'Share' to be undertaken using the following:

      • Year 7-9 Blogs
      • Year 10 Google+
      • Seniors



      ‘Share’ Opportunities in DigiTech

      The following are examples of various ‘Share’ Opportunities in Term 1 for students taking DigiTech:

      Year 7-9

      Year 7 students have been blogging about Technology when they come on Fridays.  I have not successfully and consistently prompted the Year 9 class to blog this term.

      Year 10

      Year 10 students have blogged about different DigiTech experiences in Term 1.  In addition to this, Year 10 students have been sharing and contributing into the Year 10 DigiTech Google+ Community for Brief Development.

      Year 11 NCEA Level 1

      Year 11 students have been sharing and contributing into the Level 1 DigiTech at Tamaki College Google+ Community for their first project this year, Create a Game.

      Year 12 NCEA Level 2

      Year 12 students have been sharing and contributing into the Level 2 DigiTech at Tamaki College Google+ Community for their first project this year, Create a Website.

      Year 13 NCEA Level 3

      Year 13 students have been sharing and contributing into the Level 3 DigiTech at Tamaki College Google+ Community for their first and second projects this year, Project Management, and Conceptual Design.

      Impact of ‘Share’ Opportunities in DigiTech for Students


      I have not effectively enabled 'share' to occur in a constructive and consistent manner with my early junior classes.  I have to reflect on lesson structure and integrating time to blog within the teaching and learning time within the week.

      Year 10 blogging and sharing into the Google+ community has also been sporadic and inconsistent.  However, when blogging and sharing into G+ has occurred, the sharing component has been extensive in terms of the stakeholders (Accenture Staff) who have interacted with the students.

      The Level 1, Level 2 and Level 3 sharing into Google+ communities has been far more consistent, and constructive for student learning so far in Term 1.  Students understand the value of sharing their work into the community, as they can see how they themselves, as well as their peers, learn from the work that is shared.  Students only share work that has been assessed and returned to them.  Students also don't require prompting to upload work into the communities, as they tend to do this on most occasions themselves.



      Share
      Tweet
      Pin
      Share
      3 Comments


      I had the pleasure of meeting with one of the stakeholders I identified in the ‘Who’ exercise undertaken at our first MIT weekend in February.  The reason I wanted to meet was to discuss the design process of the website and mobile app that he’d put together for his business, and whether I could apply any of this to the design thinking process I am undergoing for my project.
      I was shocked to learn the start up costs of the development of an app, not including ongoing maintenance etc.  I don’t know why I was shocked. I guess that came from just generally not knowing what the start up costs actually are.  This lead to the discussion around information flow, in terms of user interaction with the contents and materials within both a website and an app.  When I explained that I wanted to organise information within a digital tool, that would encourage users (essentially teachers) to both learn from, download resources from, and apply within their teaching practice, it became apparent that perhaps an app wasn’t necessarily the best or most effective tool to develop.  This aligned completely with feedback from Dorothy and Zac from the prototyping task at our second MIT session earlier in the week.
      What I have learnt from this conversation is the value of feedback from people who have existing digital tools, and the need to revisit the problem and opportunity that I am wanting to address.  Learning from other people’s experiences is particularly useful in using my own time and resources effectively, and also clarifying the direction of the next steps that I will take in the design process.
      Share
      Tweet
      Pin
      Share
      No Comments

      Connecting

      Sharing progress in our thinking. As we have faced the reality of the cohort of learners (and teachers) we are spending 2018 with, how has the thinking you developed at Kuaotunu gelled when ‘the rubber hit the road’?

      Sharing the progress in my thinking with my fellow MIT peers since our first MIT weekend together, meant focusing on the 'problem' as well as the 'opportunity', as outlined in the image below.

      The shifts in the usage of various VTaL tools from early in 2017 through to later in the year, showed that the Tracking Sheets was the tool that resonated most clearly with in terms of accelerating and shifting student achievement.  Therefore, I have decided to focus on this particular tool as the main driver of the entire VTaL framework ... well, at least for the time being anyway.  Connecting the focus to the problem, meant that every class (or class site) should have the tracking sheets visible and embedded into their sites for students, teachers and parents to view.

      Design Thinking- Experimentation

      Session 6: Design Thinking- Experimentation. The one we didn’t get to at Kuaotunu. Prototyping the solution we have arrived at.

      This session involved prototyping and sharing our ideas in small groups to gain feedback.  This was a particularly useful exercise which has in actual fact, lead to a re-design of my initial outcome idea, as well as my inquiry.

      Pitching the idea gave some clarity on how I envisaged the digital tool could work and would work, in relation to (based on peer feedback) how the digital tool should work, and therefore be developed.  The idea of needing to produce a mobile app wouldn't necessarily meet the needs of the intended user of the app, being teachers.  Feedback suggested that a site would allow for more scope and depth of VTaL as an overall resource.

      When I discussed the motivation and intent behind the idea of the app in more detail, it became clear that the responsive design of Google Sites, would enable the VTaL framework to sit nicely in a NEW Google Site for desktop-friendly use, as well as mobile-friendly use.  So, the outcome design has essentially changed.  This in turn, has huge implications on the development process, as there is no longer the need to focus on app development.  This is a game-changer!



      The first three images show what a NEW Google Site looks like on a desktop as well as on a mobile device.  The last image shows the existing VTaL website, which I don't believe is particularly effective in it's current form.

       
       

      Ed Tech Summit

      https://events.edtechteam.com/sydney2018
      Time to get our proposals in for the workshops we want to present in Sydney
      We will help you!! A geeky, toolkit type of session OR Unpacking aspects of your classroom practice

      The session about preparing for the Ed Tech Summit in Sydney later this year, provides a great platform to present and gain feedback from an audience who I am unlikely to have spoken to or with about VTaL.  Hence, they will be a set of fresh eyes and ears with new perspectives and views on the tool.  A great resource for stakeholder feedback.

      As I am also presenting at the Auckland Ed Tech Summit in the April School Holidays, this will give me an opportunity to trial the resources and presentation that I intend delivering in Sydney.  The presentation details are as follows:

      Name : Hinerau Anderson

      Kia ora! I am the Head of Technology at a high school in Auckland, New Zealand, Tāmaki College, where I also teach Digital Technologies to 12-18 year olds.  I have developed a Visible Teaching and Learning Framework, aptly named VTaL, based on the pedagogical practices of Learn, Create and Share.


      Title : VTaL - Visible Teaching and Learning : Tracking Student Progress in a High School


      Outline : Knowledge is key!  Imagine how empowered learners become when they have a very clear idea of what they are learning, the goal or outcome relevant to the learning, information relating to the learning, and the ability to track their own progress towards the goal and outcome.  That is exactly what the VTaL Framework enables students to do.

      This session will look at VTaL Tool 03 : Class Project Task Lists, or Tracking Sheets, which have been developed using Google Sheets, and enables students to monitor their progress throughout their projects.

      Connecting with Inquiry Frameworks

      We have been very clear that the MIT group are participating in a Design Thinking process in 2018. However, the reality is that as teachers we also carry out teaching as inquiry. In this session we want to ensure that people are working smarter not harder. We want to make the connection with your inquiries.

      The changes in the development process, have also meant that I will be tweaking my original inquiry idea.  This is what it looks like now ...

      "My Proposed Area of Inquiry in 2018, is to develop a VTaL Purpose-Built Innovative Tool, to enable all elements of the VTaL framework to be accessible to teachers, in order to accelerate student achievement."




      With the changes and adaptations to my inquiry and design thinking, I feel that I have a clearer idea of the pathway from here.  Thanks to Zac and Dorothy for the feedback during the prototype session, and again to Dorothy and Anne for your ongoing critiques and support of my inquiry which is greatly appreciated.  

      Huge thanks to Justine Todd and KPMG for the amazing work space and hospitality today!


      Share
      Tweet
      Pin
      Share
      No Comments

      Tuakana - Teina Collaborative Teaching Strategy

      Level 2 students completing their first project were starting to fall behind with specific tasks within the project.  In order to support students to catch up on their work, I teamed up the Level 2 students with some of the Level 3 students from last year who had completed the standard in 2017.

      The Level 3 students directed the Level 2's to the exemplars in the DigiTech Level 2 Google+ Community.  The Level 2's followed the instructions in the Workspace, and using both the support of the Level 3 students, as well as the exemplars in the Google+ Community, completed and submitted tasks for Activity 1 in the project.









      Share
      Tweet
      Pin
      Share
      6 Comments

      Step 1 : What are students learning today?

      1. Students navigate to the DigiTech with Ms Anderson Google Site > Year 10 >  Year 10 Overview and Calendar.  
      2. Once in the calendar, students locate the link for their class in today's date.  
      3. Students can also add the class calendar to show in their own calendar (as shown in the image below).
      4. The calendar post includes details of today's lesson instructions.


      Step 2 : What are the instructions for the task?

      1. The instructions refer students to a Workspace in the Student Dashboard of the learning activities and evidence required for each task.  The Workspace also includes resources that might help the students to complete each task.  NB:  Students who (for whatever reason) cannot access the work in the Workspace, can also locate the same learning information directly from my site.
      2. Students are able to submit completed tasks for marking.
      3. Work that students complete and submit, that satisfies the requirements of the task, is marked and returned to students (as marked).  Work that needs changes applied, will have comments added by myself, giving students feedback on what else needs to be done (as shown in the image below)

      Step 3 : How do students know if they are on track?

      1. Students are able to access information on tasks that they have completed in the Workspace Grade Sheet, which has been adapted into a Class Project Task List - Tracking Sheet (as shown in the images below). 
      2. Green indicates that the task is complete.  Orange indicates that the task is incomplete.  Red indicates that the task has not been started.

      Overview

      A lot of this process of work flow, impacts on students having access to their learning information, as well as up to date information on their progress.




      Share
      Tweet
      Pin
      Share
      No Comments








      The Tamaki College CoL Teachers, Dorothy, Karen, Nicola, Noelene and myself, presented with Lenva to staff about Teaching as Inquiry.  

      The section that I presented on what 'Setting up your Inquiry for 2018' as outlined in the link below.

      The link navigates to practical instructions for staff to set up their 2018 inquiry within their professional blogs, that aligns with one of the Manaiakalani Achievement Challenges.


      Where to start
      Setting up your Inquiry for 2018



      Share
      Tweet
      Pin
      Share
      No Comments
      Newer Posts
      Older Posts

      About Me

      Kia ora! I am the Head of Technology at Tāmaki College and also teach Digital Technologies.


      My target group of learners for my Inquiry 2021 will be my Year 12 NCEA Level 2 class. This group of learners were my target group from my 2020 Inquiry. I would like to inquire into whether Academic Writing exemplars specific to Digital Technologies, in conjunction with the 'Explanation Writing' classroom display resources for Digital Technologies, based on SOLO taxonomy, could accelerate achievement in literacy in my subject.


      My target group of learners for my Inquiry 2020 were my Year 11 NCEA Level 1 class. I inquired into the process of using the LearnCoach online programs (content) and VTaL Visible Teaching and Learning (workflow) to accelerate student achievement for Tamaki College students undertaking courses in Digital Technologies NCEA Levels 1, 2 and 3.


      In 2019, my inquiry is to maximise pedagogical practices (relating to integrated education, and collaborative teaching and learning), to effectively shift student achievement, supported by digital platforms connected to visible teaching and learning.


      My Inquiry in 2018, was to develop a VTaL Purpose-Built Innovative Tool, to enable all elements of the VTaL Framework to be accessible to teachers, in order to accelerate student achievement.


      In 2017, my inquiry was based on raising student achievement and shifting teacher practice around effective pedagogical practices including Learn, Create and Share. This will be achieved through the development, implementation and monitoring of the Visible Teaching and Learning Framework.

      recent posts

      Blog Archive

      • ▼  2022 (8)
        • ▼  March (3)
          • Hybrid Teaching and Learning | The impact of Omicron
          • Manaiakalani Toolkit | Well-being - Supporting Our...
          • Technology - Manaiakalani Department Discussions M...
        • ►  February (5)
      • ►  2021 (16)
        • ►  November (1)
        • ►  September (2)
        • ►  August (1)
        • ►  July (2)
        • ►  June (4)
        • ►  May (3)
        • ►  March (2)
        • ►  February (1)
      • ►  2020 (42)
        • ►  November (2)
        • ►  September (2)
        • ►  August (7)
        • ►  July (5)
        • ►  June (4)
        • ►  May (7)
        • ►  April (7)
        • ►  March (3)
        • ►  February (4)
        • ►  January (1)
      • ►  2019 (30)
        • ►  September (2)
        • ►  August (3)
        • ►  July (1)
        • ►  June (2)
        • ►  April (1)
        • ►  March (12)
        • ►  February (9)
      • ►  2018 (41)
        • ►  November (7)
        • ►  October (2)
        • ►  September (1)
        • ►  August (4)
        • ►  July (4)
        • ►  May (7)
        • ►  April (4)
        • ►  March (5)
        • ►  February (7)
      • ►  2017 (65)
        • ►  December (2)
        • ►  November (22)
        • ►  October (6)
        • ►  September (6)
        • ►  August (10)
        • ►  June (4)
        • ►  May (3)
        • ►  April (1)
        • ►  March (4)
        • ►  February (6)
        • ►  January (1)
      • ►  2016 (26)
        • ►  December (1)
        • ►  November (18)
        • ►  September (6)
        • ►  August (1)

      VTaL

      • VTaL (104)
      • VTaL 01 Subject Sites (33)
      • VTaL 02 Learning Activities (7)
      • VTaL 03 Tracking Sheets (28)
      • VTaL 04 Student Checklists (12)
      • VTaL 05 Calendars with Links (24)
      • VTaL 06 Workspaces (32)
      • VTaL 07 Student Sites (4)
      • VTaL 08 Year Level Sites (3)
      • VTaL 09 Subject Communities (26)
      • VTaL 10 Student Blogs (11)
      • VTaL and Google Hangouts (15)
      • VTaL and Student Achievement (45)
      • VTaL for Parents (13)
      • VTaL for Students (82)
      • VTaL for Teachers (32)

      Presentations

      • GAFE (19)
      • My YouTube Videos (8)
      • Presentations (21)

      Inquiry

      • Inquiry (134)
      • Inquiry 2019 (27)
      • Inquiry 2020 (34)
      • Inquiry 2021 (15)

      Manaiakalani

      • CoL (167)
      • Inquiry (134)
      • Inquiry 2020 (34)
      • Learn Create Share (11)
      • MIT 2018 (16)
      • Manaiakalani (18)
      • Presentations (21)
      • SPARK MIT (59)

      Tamaki College

      • 2018 Department Goals (2)
      • 2018 School Goals (3)
      • 2019 Department Goals (2)
      • CoL (167)
      • Collaborative Learning Environments (32)
      • Covid19 (29)
      • Cultural Responsiveness (10)
      • Differentiation (12)
      • EMR Collaborative Project (21)
      • Goals (2)
      • Human Rights Collaborative Project (5)
      • Integrated Education (24)
      • Kia Eke Panuku (8)
      • LearnCoach (2)
      • Literacy (21)
      • PLD (18)
      • Techies (12)
      • Technological Modelling (4)

      Practicing Teacher Criteria

      • PTC01 (31)
      • PTC02 (9)
      • PTC03 (6)
      • PTC04 (61)
      • PTC05 (17)
      • PTC06 (42)
      • PTC07 (32)
      • PTC08 (34)
      • PTC09 (8)
      • PTC10 (7)
      • PTC11 (16)
      • PTC12 (54)

      General

      • CoL (167)
      • Collaborative Learning Environments (32)
      • Cultural Responsiveness (10)
      • Differentiation (12)
      • Feedback - Parent Voice (2)
      • Feedback - Staff Voice (6)
      • Feedback - Student Voice (23)
      • GAFE (19)
      • Goals (2)
      • Integrated Education (24)
      • Kia Eke Panuku (8)
      • LearnCoach (2)
      • Literacy (21)
      • My YouTube Videos (8)
      • Review (14)
      • Student Agency (15)

      Contact Form

      Name

      Email *

      Message *

      Total Pageviews

      Created with by BeautyTemplates| Distributed By Gooyaabi Templates